Wyandots
The Last of the MohicansThe Wyandots are a Native people drawn into the colonial conflict and its shifting alliances, but they are not portrayed merely as a military force: their leaders argue over justice, land, and obligations to the dead, and their decisions are shaped by public speech. Magua’s interventions show how collective memory can be mobilized into action, while his account of past treatment exposes the unequal colonial relations surrounding the conflict.
Colonial Conflict and Political Grievance
Magua explains that when the English and French began fighting, he joined the Mohawks against his own people. He presents this choice against a larger history of displacement: white settlers have driven Native peoples from their hunting grounds, and in the current war a white man leads the way. His account makes the Wyandots’ conflict with the colonial powers part of a struggle over land and political agency, not simply a sequence of battlefield encounters.
Magua also recalls that Munro had once commanded a war party in which he, as a Mohawk, served. Munro’s rule barred a warrior who had drunk fire-water from entering the soldiers’ quarters. After Magua broke that rule while intoxicated, Munro ordered him punished in public. Magua describes the punishment as a lasting humiliation, arguing that the drink had acted in his place and that Munro’s enforcement of the rule left marks he had to conceal. Cora answers that her father had acted justly by applying the rule he had made; Magua counters that justice cannot be separated from the act of imposing a harmful condition and then punishing its consequences. The exchange exposes competing accounts of responsibility and authority rather than resolving the grievance.
Magua’s Oratory and Collective Memory
Magua’s influence rests in part on his skill as a speaker. In a council of his companions, he begins calmly, recalling their distant homeland, the arduous journey, and the services and courage of individual warriors. He then turns to the dead, recounting their losses and evoking the hardship facing their widows and children. By moving from praise of the living to the unavenged claims of the bereaved, he transforms private grief into a collective demand for action.
Later, when Uncas is held among the Wyandots, Magua again uses a public account of the dead to shape the community’s response. He recalls the attack at Glenn’s Falls and the deaths of his associates, then describes the dead as having departed without the provisions and equipment they would need in the afterlife. He urges the warriors to send Uncas after them with a burden of goods, presenting the proposed act as an obligation to the dead and a means of restoring the Wyandots’ honor. The argument draws on religious belief and shared mourning; the assembled warriors respond with anger, and one prepares to attack Uncas. The scene makes oratory a direct political force, capable of converting remembrance into a decision about a living captive.
Community and Diplomatic Encounters
The Wyandots appear as a group capable of collective consultation. After the deception by Duncan and Hawkeye is exposed, Magua relates what happened openly to the assembled fighting men. The community recognizes that it has been deceived and turns to the question of revenge; additional pursuers are sent out while the chiefs discuss what to do next. Magua listens as other warriors offer proposals before cautiously advancing his own, a sequence that presents decision-making as both communal and strategic.
At a Delaware village, Magua arrives unarmed and signals amity before approaching the chiefs. His reception is wary but recognizes him as a respected orator, one able to speak the languages used among the northern peoples. The encounter places the Wyandots within a wider field of intertribal diplomacy, where language, reputation, and formal gestures help establish the terms of contact.
Land, Kinship, and the Novel’s Framing
The novel’s account of Native dispossession is voiced not only by Magua but also by the scout, who describes the Mohicans’ former range and the small remnant of land left to their descendants. He challenges the claim that the Delawares simply accepted a pacific role, attributing their disarmament to an old agreement shaped by Dutch interests. In this account, colonial settlement and political arrangements have narrowed Native control of the land, even as the story distinguishes among peoples and their differing histories.
The narrative also sets these grievances beside the racial hierarchies of colonial society. Munro tells Duncan that Cora’s mother descended remotely from enslaved people in the West Indies; Duncan admits that prejudice against that ancestry is rooted in him, despite his denial that it should determine his judgment. This exchange concerns the Munro family, not the Wyandots, but it clarifies the broader world in which the Wyandots’ claims are heard: questions of ancestry and racial rank shape whose choices and histories are treated as legitimate. The novel gives Magua substantial command of speech and political memory, while its own descriptions also frame Native characters through the period’s racialized categories.